What exactly is meant by the term “Democratic” City?
The term “Democratic City” gets thrown around quite a bit in political circles. It tends to be used by Republican pundits, but it’s now become part of the overall discussion around crime, immigration, homelessness, etc.
What is a Democratic City?
The implication is that there is also the concept of a Republican City, though the term is rarely (ever?) mentioned.
I assume what is meant is that the city – or the county in which the city is found – voted primarily for Democratic candidates and is likely run by a Democratic mayor or city manager.
Let’s look at the largest 50 cities in the United States:
Rank
City
State
2020 pop.
County / equivalent
2020 pres. winner (county)
1
New York
NY
8,804,190
New York / Kings / Queens / Bronx / Richmond (NYC borough counties)
Biden (D)
2
Los Angeles
CA
3,898,747
Los Angeles
Biden (D)
3
Chicago
IL
2,746,388
Cook
Biden (D)
4
Houston
TX
2,304,580
Harris
Biden (D)
5
Phoenix
AZ
1,608,139
Maricopa
Biden (D)
6
Philadelphia
PA
1,603,797
Philadelphia
Biden (D)
7
San Antonio
TX
1,434,625
Bexar
Biden (D)
8
San Diego
CA
1,386,932
San Diego
Biden (D)
9
Dallas
TX
1,304,379
Dallas
Biden (D)
10
San Jose
CA
1,013,240
Santa Clara
Biden (D)
11
Austin
TX
961,855
Travis
Biden (D)
12
Jacksonville
FL
949,611
Duval (consolidated city–county)
Biden (D)
13
Fort Worth
TX
918,915
Tarrant
Biden (D)
14
Columbus
OH
905,748
Franklin
Biden (D)
15
Indianapolis
IN
887,642
Marion
Biden (D)
16
Charlotte
NC
874,579
Mecklenburg
Biden (D)
17
San Francisco
CA
873,965
San Francisco (city–county)
Biden (D)
18
Seattle
WA
737,015
King
Biden (D)
19
Denver
CO
715,522
Denver (city–county)
Biden (D)
20
Washington
DC
689,545
District of Columbia
Biden (D)
21
Nashville
TN
689,447
Davidson (consolidated city–county)
Biden (D)
22
Oklahoma City
OK
681,054
Oklahoma (plus Canadian, Cleveland, Pottawatomie)
Trump (R)
23
El Paso
TX
678,815
El Paso
Biden (D)
24
Boston
MA
675,647
Suffolk
Biden (D)
25
Portland
OR
652,503
Multnomah
Biden (D)
26
Las Vegas
NV
641,903
Clark
Biden (D)
27
Detroit
MI
639,111
Wayne
Biden (D)
28
Memphis
TN
633,104
Shelby
Biden (D)
29
Louisville
KY
633,045
Jefferson (Louisville Metro)
Biden (D)
30
Baltimore
MD
585,708
Baltimore City (independent)
Biden (D)
31
Milwaukee
WI
577,222
Milwaukee
Biden (D)
32
Albuquerque
NM
564,559
Bernalillo
Biden (D)
33
Tucson
AZ
542,629
Pima
Biden (D)
34
Fresno
CA
542,107
Fresno
Biden (D)
35
Sacramento
CA
524,943
Sacramento
Biden (D)
36
Kansas City
MO
508,090
Jackson (plus Clay, Platte, Cass)
Biden (D)
37
Mesa
AZ
504,258
Maricopa
Biden (D)
38
Atlanta
GA
498,715
Fulton (plus DeKalb)
Biden (D)
39
Omaha
NE
486,051
Douglas (plus Sarpy)
Biden (D)
40
Colorado Springs
CO
478,961
El Paso (CO)
Trump (R)
41
Raleigh
NC
467,665
Wake
Biden (D)
42
Long Beach
CA
466,742
Los Angeles
Biden (D)
43
Virginia Beach
VA
459,470
Virginia Beach (independent city)
Biden (D)
44
Miami
FL
442,241
Miami-Dade
Biden (D)
45
Oakland
CA
440,646
Alameda
Biden (D)
46
Minneapolis
MN
429,954
Hennepin
Biden (D)
47
Tulsa
OK
413,066
Tulsa (plus Osage, Wagoner)
Trump (R)
48
Bakersfield
CA
403,455
Kern
Trump (R)
49
Wichita
KS
397,532
Sedgwick
Trump (R)
50
Arlington
TX
394,266
Tarrant (plus small area in Dallas)
Biden (D)
Based on the 2020* Presidential Election results, 90% of the largest 50 cities in the country leaned Democrat. What are the takeaways from this?
Larger cities tend to lean Democrat
The term “Democrat Cities” is overwhelmingly (90% of the time) a euphemism for “urban centers” or just plain “cities.”
By extension, “Republican Cities” is thus a euphemism for “large towns” or “small cities.“
Specificism: I am coining this as a new category of socially-inacceptable language for 2024. I think it’s high time for us to shine light on an overlooked bias.
What isspecificism, you may ask? The use of definite articles, i.e., those the British Council defines as being “ in front of a noun when we believe the listener/reader knows exactly what we are referring to.” Shameful!
https://frankandrewlawler.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Specifism.png10241024franklawhttp://frankandrewlawler.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Logo_Dark-300x129.pngfranklaw2024-01-02 20:45:212024-01-06 21:58:56Specificism: An atrocity!
Walter Witherword, PhD Stratfordian Historical Apologist Trust Stratford-Upon-Avon, Warwickshire, B0L L0X, United Kingdom March 7, 2021
A Search for Deuocion
One would think it rather unlikely in this day and age to discover a completely new lead for the lost years (1585 to 1592) of William Shakespeare of Stratford-upon-Avon. Yet whilst perusing a trove of 17th century tomes, I came across the following phrase: “have presently condemned me to everlasting shatner, there to bee kept unto the laff day.”[1]
This curious word “shatner” drew my attention, particularly when preceded by “everlasting” (See Figure 1). “Everlasting” is a word, like “Everliving”, which was used, in the 16th and 17th centuries, solely in two situations:
In reference to things spiritual
When referring to William Shakespeare[2] – See Figure 4.
The title of this odd volume was A Help unto Deuocion, by a certain Samuel Heron. My first impulse was to look up the name “Deuocion”. Imagine my surprise when I found it in Romeo and Juliet! (see Figure 2: The deucion discovered!)
Figure 2: The deucion discovered (RJ, Act I: Scene 5)!
Note that the word preceding “deuocion” is “mannerly.” Now, though I shudder to mention the name, for fear of being labelled an authorship doubter, it is mere child’s play to go from “mannerly” to “manners“, as in RogerManners, 5th Earl of Rutland[3], who has been proposed by some unstable amateur academics as the “true” author of the bard’s works. But there is a connection between Rutland and Shakespeare, namely that Rutland was a close associate of the Earl of Essex, whose cabal personally strong-armed William Shakespeare into summoning his troupe to perform Richard II as an incitement to rebellion.[4] Although the history books neglectfully fail to mention any official questioning of Shakespeare about this incident, it undoubtedly did happen. Furthermore, it is highly probable that thugs physically threatened the Great Bard. Indeed, it is within the realm of possibility that he was beaten within an inch of his life, likely causing him the injury that led to the horrid penmanship of his later years.[5]
Notwithstanding the unerringly plausible intimacy between Shakespeare and the Earl of Rutland and the concomitant questioning which might have been put to Shakespeare by the queen herself in a private audience with her favorite playwright, let us shift our focus to the Earl’s provenance itself. Now the domain of the Manners family, Rutland, in the English Midlands, includes a small village called Lyndon (see Figure 3). As aficionados of American history all know, this is also the first name of the president of the United States from 1963 to 1969.
Figure 3: Lyndon, Rutland, and surroundings (map from 1646)
One of the little-known aspects of the Johnson Administration was a secret project called REDACTED. Simultaneously with its deployment, a “studio” calling itself “Paramount” in Los Angeles, California, “produced” a tele-vision show called “Star-Trek” between 1966 and 1969, i.e. the last few years of the Johnson administration.[6]
But it was all a lie. “Star-Trek” was really the cover story for REDACTED. Its “scientific fictional” format was ideal for concealing a functional time-travelling spacecraft piloted by a Major Shatner. An exhaustive search of the public NASA records produced no mention of a Shatner of any rank during this period.[7] It turns, out, however, that he was an officer on loan from the Royal Canadian Air Force.[8] Why? Likely in order to bypass congressional restrictions[9] preventing U.S. citizens from coming in contact with the highly toxic radioactive elements used in powering REDACTED.
Major Shatner also experienced several lost years wherein he unexplainedly went from being a stage actor to being a time-travelling astronaut. And what sort of stage actor was he? A Shakespearean actor (see Figure 6)! Then, mysteriously, he returned to “acting”, if it can be called that, in a tele-vision “series” that was obviously a completely fabricated obfuscation called “Barbary Coast.”[10] I personally recall seeing “advertising” for this show, but I have never met anyone who actually saw it. Did it ever actually exist?
What, you may ask, was Shatner’s first name? William. Yes! Extraordinary! The same as the Bard. Also the same initials as the Bard, i.e., W.S., which is a tantalizing segue to…
A Funeral Elegy: More Lost Years and a Connection
Of course, erudites of Elizabethan ephemera will be familiar with “A Funeral Elegy”, the heretofore presumed “anonymous” poem associated with the letters W.S., tantalizingly close to justifying an attribution to William Shakespeare. In 2002, it was proposed that W.S. may have been the name of the person[11] who had paid for the composition of the elegiac verse destined to celebrate the life of a certain William[12] Peter.
Now this supposed “actor”, i.e., Major Shatner, apparently had a “rough patch” from 1969 to 1977 in which he effectively disappeared from “Holly-wood.”[13] It is obvious, however, that all references to him being present during that time were subsequently falsified. Where was he, truly?
In 1969, an astounding observation in a little-known paper was overshadowed by the celebrated moon landing. Professor Kafka of the Max Planck Institute noted a “neutron-star-quake” emitted on February 24th of that year.[14] Remember that date.
It is universally accepted that William Shakespeare’s lost years ran from 1585, when he left his family in Stratford, to 1592, when he arrived in London and instantly became the toast of society. The Earl of Southampton, after reading his epic poem Venus and Adonis, gave him his own wing in his London residence;[15] Queen Elizabeth met with him for tea every week until her death.[16] But how did this humble Warwickshire boy, though valedictorian[17] of the Stratford Grammar School, rise to the highest echelons of English society while effectively vanishing for seven years?
What happened on February 24th, 1585? A celestial alignment, a “great conjunction” of all the planets.[18] A gravitational magnification of, literally, astronomical consequence. Enough, perhaps to create a “neutron-star-quake”?
The pieces all fall into place when one posits that a temporal tunnel was formed between these two events, 384[19] years apart. Two Williams. Two “W.S.”s. Each missing for seven years. Only a loony conspiracy theorist could think this a mere coincidence. Is not the simplest possible explanation that the two are indeed one and the same person? When one was missing in the 16th/17th century, the other one was present in the 20th century, and vice versa. William Shakespeare “died” in 1616, but in fact, ground-penetrating radar has shown that there is no coffin under the flagstone in Holy Trinity Church, Stratford – only a bag of “bones”, which doesn’t even include a skull![20] This is obviously yet another obfuscatory obstruction – likely planted by authorship deniers.
Conclusion
William Shakespeare is undoubtedly the author of the plays ascribed to William Shakespeare. The so-called “lost years” (or more accurately, perhaps, misplaced years) have been found. They all took place in the 20th century when William Shakespeare made use of his thinly-disguised pseudonym William Shatner, an admitted Shakespearean scholar and time-traveler. His supposed “death” in Stratford in 1616 actually consisted of a return to the present, where he still resides.
For those skeptics who may still insist that this is highly implausible, I ask you: Why has William Shatner never denied any of this?
[1] Heron, Samuel, A Help unto Deuocion, London: Macham, 1615
[2] See the introduction to Shake-speares Sonnets, London: Thomas Thorpe, 1609
[6] It also happened that during this time, Barbara Garson wrote a play, MacBird!, in which the characters of MacBeth and Lyndon Johnson are conflated. It is not implausible that this may not have been a coincidence. As we shall see, the 384 years which separate the two plays is not as unsurmountable an obstacle as one may presume to have expected! SeeGarson, Barbara, MacBird! Grassy Knoll Press, 1966.
[8] As of the writing of this research paper, the Canadian Armed Forces denies ever having worked with Shatner, and vice versa. Is it not curious that these denials are so coordinated with each other?
[9] Elsea, Jennifer, et al. Congressional Research Service Report R41989: Congressional Authority to Limit Military
Operations. Library of Congress Publications, 2013.
[10] Tim Brooks; Earle Marsh (2003). “Barbary Coast, The (Western)”. The Complete Directory to Prime Time Network and Cable TV Shows 1946–Present (Eighth ed.). New York: Ballantine Books. p. 86. ISBN 978-0-345-45542-0.
[11] Niederkorn, William [sic!]. “Beyond the Briefly Inflated Canon: Legacy of the Mysterious ‘W. S.'”, The New York Times, June 26, 2002.
[12] There goes that name William, again! Coincidence? I think not!
[13] And yet (!) at the same time, he supposedly starred in “Barbary Coast” – see footnote 6. Explain that!
[15] Alas, all documentation of this has been lost, but it obviously must have happened.
[16] Strangely, all the tea-time entries for Elizabeth’s reign have been lost or misplaced or perhaps stolen by authorship doubters; otherwise I am certain that Shakespeare’s name would head every guest-list.
[17] Although there are no records for the school during his youth, undoubtedly he was the smartest of the local lads. I think we can bestow upon him this honor; did any of his schoolmates eventually write 37 plays? I think not.
[18] Aston, Margaret. “The Fiery Trigon Conjunction”, Isis, Vol. 61, No.2. University of Chicago Press, 1970
[19] There’s that number again – 384. See Footnote 6.
[20] Geggel, Laura. “Shakespeare’s Skull May Have Been Stolen by Grave Robbers,” Scientific American, March 2016.
https://frankandrewlawler.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Picture6.png305531franklawhttp://frankandrewlawler.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Logo_Dark-300x129.pngfranklaw2021-03-07 19:53:002024-04-09 20:19:29The Lost Years of W.S.